Monday 7 May 2018

Assessment: The Dawn of a New Age (and the death of almost everything teachers hate)





It may seem difficult to believe right now, but I think we will look back one day and laugh at the ‘workload crisis’ that seems to fill every other education story coming out of the UK at the moment. It’s not that teachers aren’t overworked and overburdened by bureaucracy, inspection demands, endless government initiatives and a whole host of other unnecessary tasks that don’t demonstrably contribute to improved outcomes. Many are. And it’s criminal. Not just because it is ruining teachers’ lives, but because it is damaging children’s learning and life chances.

The reason I think we will get through this in the years to come is quite simply because exponential technologies are driving a revolution in the availability of hyper-personalized learning opportunities and methodologies. And when students learn differently, teachers have to teach differently. More importantly, teachers are able to teach in a far more efficient and targeted way, empowered by transformational models of planning, teaching, learning and assessment. We have been witnessing the seeds of this paradigm shift taking root for a number of years, albeit agonizingly slowly. The necessary disruption, as noted in a Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation report back in 2010, remains “fragmented and sub-scale.”

But I am always optimistic… The School of One in New York, referenced in that report, was a bold disruption, even if the jury is still out on the impact (see http://izonenyc.org/initiatives/school-of-one/). Now that exponential technologies are becoming available to help support such approaches, I believe we will see a resurgence of these methodologies, with an accompanying improved understanding of the wider models and support structures necessary to make them successful. For example, the Rahhal initiative in Dubai seeks to revolutionize education provision, truly personalizing the learning journey for students, and bringing together multiple partners from across the city. Again, this is a bold move, which will require completely re-thinking the physical logistics of where, how and with whom students learn, as well as an unprecedented technological ecosystem to support that learning and track personal progress and achievements.

I have previously written at length on the topics of leadership, professional learning, parent engagement, environments, curriculum and pedagogical transformation, and developed holistic educational models to ensure that digital tools are embedded as a necessary element of the learning process, rather than as the inevitably fatal and wasteful ‘add-on’.  Recognizing that we should always be mindful of focusing on one area of this process in isolation (each element is critical and part of the whole), I will now look at the future of assessment (including tracking), and the related areas of reporting and portfolio-building. These are habitual offenders in the workload stakes, so it is worth taking some time to explore how the work of schools in these areas is being disrupted. 

There are two enormous, and related, gains to be made in disrupting the assessment process:

1.       Assessment re-imagined as an essential mechanism to deliver hyper-personalized learning; and

2.       Freeing teachers from the administrative data burden, enabling them to maximize their efficiency, spending their time almost exclusively doing what they love - working with students.

The dream, then, is that technology can be leveraged to not only facilitate more effective, personalized workflows, but also to ensure that the pain points of data entry and reporting are transformed into rewarding, embedded and natural actions that sit close to the learning and the learner, improving outcomes and reducing teacher workload. This speaks to the very origins of the word ‘assessment’, being derived from the Latin ‘assider’ – literally, ‘to sit beside’. When we keep this in mind at all times, and leverage the right technologies, it is easier to grasp the rationale of what is coming – and accept and celebrate what will be lost.

In GEMS schools, and building on work done previously at Royal Dubai School and Wellington Academy Silicon Oasis, we have just completed phase 1 of a Proof of Concept, looking at optimizing blended and online workflows to incorporate every element of the teaching and learning cycle. This included Kinteract, a social media style portfolio builder, assessment and tracking tool and recommendation engine that I have written about previously. Combined with simple multimedia forums, learning management system tools and the Office 365 productivity suite, we have been able to demonstrate a highly effective workflow, in which the teacher interacts in real time and asynchronously with every student, delivering personalized support and timely interventions. Moreover, all data and portfolio entries, grading and reporting are built into the process and, with the teacher being assisted in her future planning by Kinteract’s recommendation engine, there is no need for any further administrative work to be carried out. All data is available live to parents, school leaders, teachers and students.

At JESS in Arabian Ranches, Dubai, Principal Mark Steed is looking to make Power BI, with the data flowing from iSAMS, available live to parents in an easy to read format – a bold move that has the potential to finally kill the dreaded (and largely useless, instantly out of date) school report. Mark uses the powerful analogy of the paper bank statement being replaced by live mobile banking to make the case for live, 24/7 reporting. In my own experience with Kinteract, I often reference Facebook. Of course, Facebook does offer a summary of the year in the form of an automated video, which is a ‘nice to have’ – but the point is that we don’t need this to keep up to date with, and act on, events throughout the year. Similarly, Kinteract can generate summative reports, but I anticipate these will only be required for transfer purposes, with parents gradually accepting and embracing live reporting in the same way they use Facebook and mobile banking.

This technology is smart, but is only the beginning of things to come. It will not be long before such tools begin to incorporate personal assistants such as Cortana, Siri, Alexa and Microsoft Cognitive Services, and combine with physical interfaces like Woogie and then holograms like the rather scary new Barbie. We only need to look at the latest hologram technology out of China to realize this is not science fiction. It is only a matter of time before the EdTech, AI and toy industries merge to create powerful new learning tools. This may start as AI-driven apps on student devices, but will soon evolve into physical assistants, holograms projected from wearables and, ultimately, earpieces and even implants and nanobots floating around the bloodstream! We’ve come a long way since the old ‘Speak&Spell’!


'We've come a long way since the old 'Speak&Spell'

I envisage students within the next few years starting to bring their personal learning assistants to school, thereby opening a whole new Pandora’s box that will make the mobile phone issue look rather quaint. Bring Your Own Device Policies will begin to incorporate ‘Bring Your Own Assistant’ clauses and teachers will need to learn to work in partnership with these assistants. This may sound crazy, but it is the natural evolution of what we are already seeing in our work with Kinteract, and with other AI-driven platforms such as Cerego and Century,  where teachers are beginning to work with the systems’ recommendation engines to ensure children are following and achieving the correct next steps. (Also see https://www.osmosis.org/, which is aimed at medical students, but could easily be adapted to work for K-12, and Volley, which is particularly exciting as it was founded by a GEMS graduate - wow!). It is easy to see students suddenly starting to use tools such as Volley in class, and this creating conflict with the teacher in the short term... those who adapt and embrace such technologies, rather than shutting them down out of fear, will thrive - and see their students do the same.

Indeed, I also envisage a core element of the curriculum for students being devoted to interacting with AI systems, moving way beyond keyboard skills. Just as we have seen the emergence of being able to find, filter and evaluate sources and information on the Internet as a key skill, we will soon be requiring children to learn how to interact effectively with AI, how to interpret recommendations and, crucially, when to override advice. And that’s before we teach them how to actually build the AI themselves!

This now leads us to the really exciting new technology that is likely to transform assessment, progress tracking, portfolio building and certification – Blockchain. I first realized the potential of Blockchain technology a couple of years ago when I saw the musician Imogen Heap present at the BETT show in London. Since then, I have become more aware of the edtech startups (see http://quze.co/ for a local example just getting off the ground) and more established companies (e.g. https://www.learningmachine.com/) scrambling to be the first to make inroads in the education sphere. In effect, Blockchain technology is being utilized to create immutable personalized portfolios of achievements and certifications. These are now being commonly referred to as ‘learning wallets,’ paying homage to the origins of the technology in Bitcoin. Combined with other technologies connecting students with courses, teachers, peers, content and industry, this development promises to accelerate the hyper-personalization of learning revolution.

So what will we see dying in our schools? Once these new, streamlined and hyper-personalized methodologies and technologies begin to take hold in our schools, I anticipate that the traditional (and even some of the newer) student tracking tools and certain MIS/SIS modules will be under threat. There will be no more data entry removed from the learning in time and place. There will simply be no need to enter data again into a tracking or grading system, as this has already been recorded at the point of learning. There will be no need for teachers to write reports at the end of the term or year – why would they need to, when the data is not only available live to parents 24/7, but also being contributed to, by the parents and students themselves, as is possible with Kinteract?

In the not-too-distant future, learning will be hyper-personalised and teachers will be working very differently. And, if they embrace the new age, they will have the opportunity to love every moment of their work. The best way to predict the future is to create it. And it’s happening anyway, so we need to get on the bus – and (probably) on the Blockchain.